A survey recently conducted by the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation suggests that most teachers who regularly use digital tools in their
instructional preparation are unhappy with the quality of the data collected or
with the tools they use to collect the data.
Interesting… data are important to collect but not if these
data are not used. A teacher and coach can certainly decide in the “before”
conference which data to collect and then use a tool in the “during”
to collect the agreed upon data. But, the real conversations take place in
determining how that data are used with a follow up conversation in the “after”
to debrief and review the initial goals and the purpose for collecting those
data.
The report (Education Week Teacher, June 5, 2015) indicates
that teachers completing the survey feel very uncomfortable and at a loss about
data collection. They cite three reasons why: 1)teachers feel inundated with
the data collection process vs. instructional preparation; 2) they want
suggestions about using the data, i.e., so now what; and 3) they want more than
just numbers in helping them guide the learning process for both themselves and
their students. They want to know more about how students learn and what they
can do to improve their practices.
Digital tools are really important. And, schools have a
social responsibility to help prepare their students for 21st
century learning by using a plethora of innovative tools. They also have a
responsibility to help teachers understand which digital tools are appropriate
for learning to take place without overwhelming the teachers with collection
vs. usage.
How can instructional
coaching support teachers and help them understand more about data collection,
its use, and making learning more relevant, productive, and collaborative?