In the October 20, 2015 Ed Week online commentary, Mike Schmoker comments
that a transformation in teacher education will require the answers to two
questions: 1) Are we training teachers
in methods that are among the very best practices that exist today—those with
the strongest, most enduring evidence base and pedigree; and 2) Are we
observing those principles most essential to effective training that focuses on
frequent monitoring, feedback, and follow-up training?
These two questions are very important for instructional coaches…are coaches
and other school leaders sharing the most effective (I don’t think “best” is a
wise word choice) instructional techniques, strategies, and practices with
their teaching colleagues; are teachers receiving the support they need to
ensure that the practices shared are appropriate to their students’ needs; and
are teachers given the opportunity to practice what they learn and given feedback
in real time?
As an instructional coach, you know the importance of bringing teachers
together, honoring their voices, and providing opportunities for them to share
their expertise. Remember what Urban Institute researcher Jane Hannaway said, “Teachers work in isolation. They learn
what they learn and then they plateau. They get no valid input.” You need to be the catalyst that ensures
multiple opportunities for teachers to learn from each other. Students benefit
when their teachers learn from their peers. As per the Importance of Peer Learning for Teachers study (Jackson &
Bruegmann, 2009) … when the quality of a teacher’s colleagues improve, the
students of that teacher benefit.
When teachers learn, share, and practice
together, they become more knowledgeable in their content, more skilled in
delivering that content, and more likely to engage in reflective practices
which helps them make adjustments in their teaching to better meet the needs of
their students.
Coaches are on the side of helping teachers implement effective
instructional practices by helping them identify which practices are effective
and which practices need to be strengthened.
How do you help teachers identify
their most effective instructional practices and then help them collectively
problem-solve and work collaboratively?
By Ellen Eisenberg
By Ellen Eisenberg, Executive Director of The Professional Institute for Instructional Coaching (TPIIC)
Monday, November 2, 2015
Thursday, October 15, 2015
As this year goes into full swing, think about helping your
colleagues learn together. If you have not done so already, walk around the
building where you coach and elicit some ideas from your teaching colleagues
about themes that support student learning and how you can collaborate to
concentrate on those themes. Work with
your colleagues and strategize ways that those themes can become some of the
learning focuses for the year. As a coach, think about providing opportunities
for colleagues to work together and address some of the learning needs shared.
This is a powerful way for colleagues to learn from each other.
Taking the pulse of the school is a very effective way to
stay “in touch” with your colleagues, giving them a voice. It is also a way to
plan professional development around topics that are important to them. It’s really a grass roots approach that
captures not only the short term items that may be on several colleagues’ minds
but can also be developed into a long term plan for school wide improvement.
If you haven’t created a needs assessment yet this year,
think about gathering the collective wisdom of your colleagues and generating
one. If you have one from last year, revisit it and make any necessary
adjustments so that you can use the assessment to make suggestions and plan
ongoing professional development sessions that are relevant to the individual
and collective needs of the school.
Use the assessment as a planning tool for the year. This
tool can be useful for whole school, small group, and one-to-one interactions.
Your colleagues might even organize PLCs around some of the ideas that emerge
from the needs assessment. In whatever ways you use this kind of tool, remember
that the key here is taking those ideas and providing opportunities for your
colleagues to work together and share their learning. Great content for the BDA cycle of
consultation!!
How have you used a
needs assessment as a rich resource from your teaching colleagues in your
building?
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
Two weeks
ago, the PIIC mentors met for their two-day statewide mentor meeting. They
collaborated and designed a variety of professional development sessions that
would be implemented throughout the year at their local, regional, and
statewide professional learning conferences. This year, the focus is on “The BDA cycle in practice.”
You may
remember reading about the BDA cycle of consultation in previous blogs: the “B”
or before session is where the coach
and teacher or group of teachers discuss and co-construct the agreed upon “look
fors” as well as decide what the teacher’s and coach’s roles are when the visit
takes place; the date and time for the debriefing are also scheduled at this
time. The “D” or during session is
the actual visit; this is the data collection stage with a list that was
generated in the before session. The “A” or after
session is the time for debriefing. This is where the coach and teacher reflect
on what they saw or did (during) and align it to what they planned (before). Depending
on the roles, both the teacher and the coach give/get feedback. This is where
beliefs are discussed and ultimately where professional practice is changed.
In reality,
not every teacher has the luxury of meeting his/her coach for each of the three
sessions every time they work together. Every effort, however, should be made to meet for a complete cycle at least once or twice a quarter. When the full cycle occurs, the coach and teacher
engage in a 3-pronged cycle that is collaborative, confidential, collective,
and communal. Many part time coaches have blended their approach to the BDA
cycle. They plan using an electronic tool, e.g., google docs, Crocodoc,
NineHub, Wallwisher, or other collaborative tools when they do not have the
opportunity to meet F2F. Unfortunately, there is no substitution for the “D.” A
coach and teacher need to see each other in the classroom. That visit is the
basis for the debriefing in the “A.” The conversation in the “A” can sometimes
be virtual using Skype, google hangouts, GoToMeeting or similar tools.
Don’t let
the shortage of time prevent you from meeting with teachers in planned and
intentional ways.
How do you blend your approach and follow
the BDA cycle of consultation in your coaching?
Monday, September 21, 2015
In the August 2015 issue of JSD, Learning Forward’s Director of Communications, Tracy Crow, reminds us that learning
from one’s colleagues makes quite a difference in the “take aways” from those
conversations. Whether formally or informally, the professional dialogue that emerges
from conversations with one another helps to collectively problem-solve and to think
“out loud” about problems of practice. These conversations are truly learning
moments when colleagues share ideas, ask questions, reflect on practice, and
focus on learning… one’s own learning.
When talking to my colleagues about what they value the most in a coaching relationship, the opportunity to talk to colleagues without fear of admitting their own weaknesses surfaces as the most valuable asset in the partnership. They readily acknowledge that their teaching peers have a wealth of information and are incredible resources in the learning environment. They recognize that gathering the collective wisdom from a group of experienced practitioners scaffolds their own learning and improves their practice by virtue of listening, sharing, collaborating, and discovering new ideas.
Instructional coaches are instrumental in creating environments that foster collaboration and long-term professional learning. They help create a culture of change in learning communities and reinforce the notion that professional development is critical for school wide improvement and must be sustained. While not experts, coaches bring colleagues together so they can form partnerships, establish a critical friends’ learning group, and reflect on effective practices. They help their colleagues internalize what they learn and build on those ideas so that the learning becomes cumulative.
When talking to my colleagues about what they value the most in a coaching relationship, the opportunity to talk to colleagues without fear of admitting their own weaknesses surfaces as the most valuable asset in the partnership. They readily acknowledge that their teaching peers have a wealth of information and are incredible resources in the learning environment. They recognize that gathering the collective wisdom from a group of experienced practitioners scaffolds their own learning and improves their practice by virtue of listening, sharing, collaborating, and discovering new ideas.
Instructional coaches are instrumental in creating environments that foster collaboration and long-term professional learning. They help create a culture of change in learning communities and reinforce the notion that professional development is critical for school wide improvement and must be sustained. While not experts, coaches bring colleagues together so they can form partnerships, establish a critical friends’ learning group, and reflect on effective practices. They help their colleagues internalize what they learn and build on those ideas so that the learning becomes cumulative.
As a coach, what are
some of the ways you can help your teaching colleagues take advantage of the
greatest learning environment around… your building?
Wednesday, August 26, 2015
For almost two years, the South African Department of Higher
Education and Training along with their partner organizations have been
communicating with us about instructional coaching as a job-embedded
professional development model for their teachers. They want to provide a
vehicle for supporting the teachers who work with students who are post-high
school graduates but not quite ready for a 4 year college or university. These students
attend TVET colleges which are similar to our community colleges. The
government wants to provide the teachers of these students with every
opportunity to improve their craft and address the needs of this student
population.
So, four of us went to Johannesburg, South Africa, to
provide a 5-day intensive professional development training to educate
individuals who were selected to become coaches and mentors. As a “train the
trainers” model, we worked with a small group of individuals who will now
provide turnaround training for more potential coaches and mentors to the other
TVET sites.
Our participants were receptive and responsive, absorbing
all the lessons we have learned about working with adult learners, designing an
instructional coaching model, building teacher capacity, and improving student
engagement. They shared pieces of their culture with us and focused on our
similarities rather than our differences. We modeled our 4-quadrant framework
and our BDA cycle of consultation, helping them to understand why collaboration,
communication, collective problem-solving, and critical friends groups are
essential for change and school wide improvement. We talked about working one-on-one
and in small groups to support teachers and school leaders; engaged in focused
discussions about data collection and use; shared evidence-based literacy
practices across all content areas; and conveyed the importance of reflection
and non-evaluative practice for making sustainable change.
It is our hope that a team from South Africa will join us
for our October PIIC Professional Learning Opportunity so they can see
firsthand how instructional coaches collaborate and create safe environments.
We want them to see how coaches are on the side of helping teachers implement
effective instructional practices regardless of the student population or
needs. We want them to see how the transparency and shared vision for helping
students transcends culture and geography.
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
A survey recently conducted by the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation suggests that most teachers who regularly use digital tools in their
instructional preparation are unhappy with the quality of the data collected or
with the tools they use to collect the data.
Interesting… data are important to collect but not if these
data are not used. A teacher and coach can certainly decide in the “before”
conference which data to collect and then use a tool in the “during”
to collect the agreed upon data. But, the real conversations take place in
determining how that data are used with a follow up conversation in the “after”
to debrief and review the initial goals and the purpose for collecting those
data.
The report (Education Week Teacher, June 5, 2015) indicates
that teachers completing the survey feel very uncomfortable and at a loss about
data collection. They cite three reasons why: 1)teachers feel inundated with
the data collection process vs. instructional preparation; 2) they want
suggestions about using the data, i.e., so now what; and 3) they want more than
just numbers in helping them guide the learning process for both themselves and
their students. They want to know more about how students learn and what they
can do to improve their practices.
Digital tools are really important. And, schools have a
social responsibility to help prepare their students for 21st
century learning by using a plethora of innovative tools. They also have a
responsibility to help teachers understand which digital tools are appropriate
for learning to take place without overwhelming the teachers with collection
vs. usage.
How can instructional
coaching support teachers and help them understand more about data collection,
its use, and making learning more relevant, productive, and collaborative?
Monday, June 1, 2015
Last week, one of the PIIC
coaches started an IU Instructional Coaching Chat on Twitter. We were trying this communication thread to
see how we can engage more coaches in conversations about their practices. This
particular chat was about the coach’s reflection of the past year and
strategies for summer engagement for coaches to initiate with teachers.
I must admit… I am a real
neophyte (or dinosaur) when it comes to virtual communication. I am okay with
email and text messages but not so much with Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram! I
do know, however, that I could ask any tween or teenager to help me navigate
social media and s/he could do it easily!
The first
question of the chat (https://storify.com/LitCoachJackieW/piiciu10-chat-may-18th-2015) asked coaches to think about the
“year in review” and reflect about the coaching role. This is so similar to how
I felt when I reflected on my teaching for the year. Were my goals realistic
and attainable? Did I have short range, mid-range, and long range goals? Did I
accomplish what I set out to do? If not, what were the obstacles that stood in
my way? If I accomplished my goals, did I accomplish them in the ways I thought
I would or to the extent that I projected I would? What should I have done
differently or not at all? What changes can I make for the next year both in
content and process? What have I learned about myself as a learner and about my
students as learners? As a coach, what have I learned about my teaching
colleagues as well?
To me,
reflection equals change. And that change requires some action. Sometimes,
minor changes are needed and sometimes, a major overhaul is needed. Either way,
the important “note to self” is that every action takes planning, delivering,
and debriefing. As a coach, this process can be accomplished with your own
coach, the IU mentor, or with another trusted colleague. Make sure you take
this step in reviewing your coaching work and preparing for your own
professional growth. Remember, no change takes place without reflection and
modification.
What are some of the things you have
learned about your coaching work this year?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)